The accounting profession is in the midst of a significant crisis, grappling with a severe shortage of accountants. This crisis is underscored by a concerning decline in the number of students pursuing accounting majors, resulting in a 33% drop in first-time CPA exam candidates from 2016 to 2021. The AICPA/CIMA 2022 Annual Report further reveals a 7% decrease in CPA exam candidates from 2021 to 2022, marking the lowest number of exam takers since 2006.
The problem is multi-faceted, with various factors contributing to the dwindling interest in accounting as a career choice. These include the perception that accounting is boring, lower compensation compared to other majors, a lack of diversity, and the perception that the accounting major is too specialized. Additionally, the 150-hour requirement is viewed as a significant barrier to entry, deterring potential candidates and adding an extra layer of financial burden.
An alarming statistic is that 75% of AICPA members are nearing retirement age, exacerbating the shortage of skilled professionals in the field. The pending enrollment cliff expected to hit in 2025, resulting from a decline in birth rates, further compounds the problem.
One significant proposal to address the crisis is the elimination of the 150-hour requirement. While this requirement was intended to better prepare students and enhance the profession's image, critics argue that it has not proven effective. A study found no differences in the quality of accountants with or without the additional 30 hours, indicating that the requirement may be deterring potential entrants without tangible benefits.
Alternatively, the authors propose a compromise solution tied to the upcoming new CPA exam in 2024. This includes requiring all CPA candidates to pass three core exam sections and, for those with a minimum 120-credit hour bachelor's degree, an additional discipline exam. Candidates with a master's degree related to one of the disciplines would be exempt from the discipline exam. This option aims to provide flexibility and attract more students to the accounting profession.
Despite potential initial resistance from organizations like the AICPA and NASBA due to potential revenue decreases, the authors argue that these changes are crucial for the long-term health of the accounting profession. The proposed solutions aim to increase the number of students majoring in accounting, ultimately benefiting the entire industry.
In conclusion, the accounting profession faces a critical juncture that demands immediate and dramatic changes. The proposed solutions, particularly the reconsideration of the 150-hour requirement, offer a pathway to address the shortage of accountants and ensure the profession's sustainability in the face of evolving challenges.
To read the full article please click here.
Comments